• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

Michelle's blog

Food allergy and food intolerance, freefrom foods, electrosensitivity, this and that...

  • Home
  • Blog
  • About
  • FreeFrom Food Awards
  • Foods Matter
  • Walks & Gardens
  • Salon Music
  • Home
  • Blog
  • About
  • FreeFrom Food Awards
  • Foods Matter
  • Walks & Gardens
  • Salon Music

Elucidating allergy/intolerance confusion….

12/01/2013 //  by Michelle Berridale Johnson//  4 Comments

Last week we had a meeting with the lovely Ceres PR who will be working with us on promoting the FreeFrom Food Awards this year – and one of the things they asked us to outline for them in our briefing was areas of confusion in ‘freefrom’ and allergy/intolerance.

Not a problem, I thought, a couple of quick sentences – until I actually came to think about it. At which point I realised that the whole subject was fraught with confusion, both in terms of what freefrom/allergy/intolerance actually mean – and what they are called. So, for everyone’s benefit….

• ‘FreeFrom’ – a relatively loose term applied to any product (not only food) that is ‘free of’ whatever it is that you do not want to eat/put on your skin/use on your loo etc.

Those who are intolerant of gluten think it only applies to gluten-free foods, those who have a dairy problem think it only applies to dairy-free foods, those who have multiple allergies/ intolerances think that ‘freefrom foods’ will be free of all of their allergens and get quite upset when they are not!

‘FreeFrom’ is not a ‘marque’ and has no legal or regulatory status. There is no governing or policing body for freefrom.

However, the term has been widely adopted by the food industry as a ‘cover all’ term for ‘dietary’ foods that are gluten/wheat/dairy/nut etc free. It is also now starting to be used for foods that are free of other ingredients which are perceived to be unhealthy  (such as additives) and, by extension, even for ‘ethical’ foods – fair trade, organic, low food miles, animal friendly etc.

• Allergy  / intolerance

The medical definition of food allergy is an immediate immune system reaction sparked by the binding of an IgE antibody to a mast cell thereby causing a release of histamine.

The medical definition of  food intolerance is a delayed reaction to a food which does not involve the immune system, the symptoms of which are extremely varied and can be behavioural/psychological as well as physical.

These definitions tend only to be understood by the medical profession – and not by all of them!!

The average food intolerance sufferer thinks of him/herself as a food allergy sufferer which explains the huge divergence between the ‘official figures’ for food allergy (1-2% of the population) and the popular perception (30-40% of the population). Dietitians, in particular, get very exercised about this…..

• Cow’s milk allergy and lactose intolerance

1. Cow’s milk allergy is an immune response (see allergy above) to one or more proteins in cow’s milk – can be fatal.

2. Cow’s milk intolerance is a food intolerance (see intolerance above) to some or all the constituents (not necessarily proteins) in cow’s milk.

3. Lactose intolerance is not, strictly speaking, an intolerance at all but a deficiency of the enzyme lactase which digests the lactose sugar in milk. (In lactose intolerance the undigested lactose sugar ferments in the gut giving the typical digestive symptoms of lactose intolerance.)

Lactose intolerance has nothing to do with cow’s milk allergy and although it is possible to suffer from both, they are totally separate conditions.
Very few outside the medical profession understand the differences so the three terms are used indiscriminately.

• Coeliac disease, gluten sensitivity/intolerance, wheat allergy, wheat intolerance

1. Coeliac disease is an autoimmune condition in which the protein fraction, gliadin, found in wheat, barley and rye, causes the villi or fronds which line the small intestine to atrophy thereby preventing the sufferer absorbing nutrition from what they eat and preventing its proper digestion. It can have wide ranging symptoms many of which may be digestive, but need not be. It is thought to affect around  1 in 70 of the population although it is also thought to be heavily under-diagnosed.

2. Gluten sensitivity/intolerance. This is an intolerance (see above) to the gluten which is found in all grains. It is a ‘new’ intolerance in that its existence is only just coming to be recognised; it may, in some degree or other, be very common.

3. Wheat allergy – an allergy (see above) to one or several of the proteins in  wheat.

4. Wheat intolerance – an intolerance, see above, to one or several of the constituents (not necessarily proteins) of wheat. This appears to be most common in relation to highly processed, high-gluten flours and products made from them.

All four conditions are commonly confused.

• Dairy / eggs

Eggs are not a dairy product although many people think they are – I have never been able to get my head around why they should!!
Strictly speaking dairy products only refer to cow’s milk products although the term is often taken to refer to all animal milk products (goat, sheep, camel, mare, donkey etc etc)

• Butter

Strictly speaking ‘butter’ refers only to churned animal milk but it is used in common parlance in other contexts – cacao/cocoa butter, coconut butter, shea butter, nut butters etc – which have nothing to do with cow’s or animal milk. However, the terminology causes a great deal of confusion amongst those who think they might be dairy/milk/cow’s milk intolerant.

• ‘Milk’

The term should only refer to cow’s milk or at least to animal milks. However, for convenience it is also used in general parlance (not  in ingredients lists or on food labels) for almost any drink which is white(ish) and can be used for similar purposes as cow’s milk eg. soya milk, rice milk, coconut milk, oat milk, spelt milk etc

• Nut/peanut allergies

1. Peanuts are not tree nuts but legumes – eg fruits which grow and ripen in a pod – so being peanut allergic does not mean that you will be tree nut allergic or vice versa – although some people can be allergic to both.

2. Tree nuts include  walnut, almond, hazelnut, cashew, pistachio, and Brazil nuts of which cashews, Brazils and hazelnuts are usually thought to cause the most serious allergic reactions.

3. Although coconut are treenuts they are not usually considered to have a high allergy risk.

4. Seeds – pine nuts, pumpkin seeds, sunflower seeds, sesame seeds etc. These are not nuts and, although you can be allergic to any/all of them and you can have both a nut and a seed allergy, the fact that you are allergic to nuts does not mean you will be allergic to seeds and vice versa.

Hope you are now somewhat wiser….  If not – for more information check out:

The articles on FreeFromFoodsMatter for more on ‘freefrom’
The articles on the food allergy/intolerance section of Foods Matter for more than you will ever want to know about food allergy/intolerance!
The articles in the cow’s milk allergy sections and the lactose intolerance section of FoodsMatter
Our CoeliacsMatter site for anything you want to know about coeliac disease, gluten sensitivity or wheat allergy.
The peanut/treenut section of FoodsMatter for related articles.

Category: Allergies, Dairy-free, Food, FreeFrom Food, Gluten-freeTag: 'butter' is not always a dairy product, Allergy, allergy to nuts not same as allergy to seeds, brazil and cashews nuts most allergic, Ceres PR, coeliac disease, confusion between coeliac disease and gluten sensitivity, confusion between food allergy and food intolerance, Cow's milk allergy, eggs are not dairy products, Food allergy, Food intolerance, freefrom, Freefrom food, FreeFrom Food Awards, freefrom has no legal status, freefrom is not a marque, Freefrom skincare, gluten sensitivity/intolerance, lactase, lactose intolerance, medical understanding of food allergy, peanut allergics may not be treenut allergic, peanuts are legumes no tree nuts, popular perception of food allergy

Previous Post: « Heavy metal toxicity and behaviour – at last the connection is made!
Next Post: Allergen-free skiing in the French Alps »

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Micki

    14/01/2013 at 10:36

    What a fab review, Michelle, thank you! I shall point people to that one. It is SO confusing for people, isn’t it? Comes down to difference between med-speak and common usage of the words, as you point out.

    The only thing I would question is whether intolerance involves the immune system or not. I never quite get that definition. We just don’t understand it fully by a long chalk yet so how do we know it doesn’t? We do know that many other antibodies can turn up in delayed food testing eg IgG, IgA, IgM etc and that has to be immune involvement, and I would imagine there are many other processes we haven’t a clue about yet. I think it very likely does involve the immune system and I think this official definition means, in med-speak again, that ‘intolerance’ doesn’t involve the immune system in the same way as an acute IgE reaction, which is correct but too limiting in my view. As you say: a minefield.

  2. Michelle

    14/01/2013 at 12:35

    Entirely agree about the immune involvement in food intolerance – actually about the immune system’s involvement in almost everything…. But, for now the divide between IgE and immediate and obvious immune system reaction and the delayed intolerance reactions which, if they do involve the immune system, do it is a less ‘in your face’ sort of way seem to make some sort of sense out of what is otherwise a totally fuzzy area.

    Keep up your good work and in due course we may know more!!

Trackbacks

  1. Allergy and Intolerance: Clear As Mud! | Purehealth Clinic says:
    14/01/2013 at 10:50

    […] her best to, as she says, ‘elucidate’ the confusion surrounding this area of medicine. Go and have a read. I shall post it on the website allergy area I think; might save me some explaining! Good one, […]

  2. Allergy and Intolerance Terms: Clear As Mud! | TrulyGlutenFree says:
    14/01/2013 at 10:52

    […] her best to, as she says, ‘elucidate’ the confusion surrounding this area of medicine. Go and have a read. I shall post it on the website allergy area I think; might save me some explaining! Good one, […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Colliding with a new reality – the hazards of low vision
  • Call for adult allergy sufferers
  • The vegan/allergy labelling issue
  • A gluten free Christmas just could be delicious – not a penance!
  • A food fad won’t kill you – an allergy will

Search this blog

ARCHIVES

Blogroll

  • Allergy Insight
  • Better brains, naturally
  • For Ever FreeFrom
  • Free From (gluten)
  • Freefrom Food Awards
  • Gluten-free Mrs D
  • Natural Health Worldwide
  • Pure Health Clinic
  • Skins Matter
  • The Helminthic Therapy Wiki
  • Truly Gluten Free
  • What Allergy?

TOPICS

A food fad won’t kill you – an allergy will

There has been a predictable outcry in the allergy world this week’s in response to Rachel Johnson’s piece in Thursday’s Evening Standard on ‘dietary requirements’ and food fads. Being charitable, I am assuming that she has never suffered from or lived with someone with a food allergy. However, I do have some sympathy with her …

Bioplastics – a solution or part of the problem?

Everyday Plastic is a social enterprise group using accessible learning and publicity campaigns to reduce the amount of plastics used daily in our society. It was founded by its current director Daniel Webb who, having moved to Margate in Kent in 2016, was horrified to discover that there were no plastic recycling options on offer.  …

FreeFrom Christmas Awards – the Winners

Since they were launched two years ago the FreeFrom Christmas Awards have been a great success. And how lucky are ‘freefrom-ers’ these days!  From Advent calendars to gifts, party food to Christmas dinner, there is no longer any need for them to miss out. Indeed, the whole family can happily eat freefrom and never know …

Do not extradite Julian Assange to the US

Julian Assange is being sought by the current US administration for publishing US government documents which exposed war crimes and human rights abuses. The politically motivated charges represent an unprecedented attack on press freedom and the public’s right to know – seeking to criminalise basic journalistic activity. Assange is facing a 175-year sentence for publishing …

What to believe – applying critical thought

For the average citizen evaluating the claims made for cure all – or even improve all – health products and procedures has always been difficult. Not only is it an area in which we have minimal expertise but most of us have a vested interest in finding a miracle intervention that will solve our health …

Could wireless monitoring devices be killing racehorses?

Regular readers may remember that back in August last year I alerted you to a posting on Arthur Firstenberg’s Cellphone Task Force site about phone masts and bird flu. Could there be a connection between the fact that the two wildlife sites in Holland and Northern France which had suffered catastrophic bird flu deaths were …

Site Footer

Copyright © 2025 · Michelle's Blog · Michelle Berridale Johnson · Site design by DigitalJen·