• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

Michelle's blog

Food allergy and food intolerance, freefrom foods, electrosensitivity, this and that...

  • Home
  • Blog
  • About
  • FreeFrom Food Awards
  • Foods Matter
  • Walks & Gardens
  • Salon Music
  • Home
  • Blog
  • About
  • FreeFrom Food Awards
  • Foods Matter
  • Walks & Gardens
  • Salon Music

Dairy disappointment

04/10/2012 //  by Michelle Berridale Johnson//  4 Comments

From all the headlines over the last few weeks, dairy allergics could not be blamed for thinking that all their problems had been solved – if Australian A2 milk did not do it for them, then Daisy, the hypo-allergenic New Zealand cow certainly would… But, alas, beyond the hype, the real news is less encouraging.

Both stories have been covered in more depths on the FoodsMatter site. See Frances Dale on the A2 milk story here; I have covered the Daisy story here.  But to bring you up to speed, at speed….
The milk from A2 cows, which include Jerseys and Guernseys, does not include the A1 beta-casein protein that breaks down in the digestion into a protein fragment, BCM7/beta-casomorphin-7, that behaves like an opiate, and has been blamed for much cow’s milk allergy as well cardiovascular disease, type 1 diabetes and autism.
Daisy, the New Zealand cow, has been genetically modified not to produce beta-lactoglobulin, the protein in whey which is thought to be responsible for much cow’s milk allergy especially amongst babies and small children.

But the sad fact is that, even if available and on the market – and whatever about A2, there is no chance that Daisy’s milk would be on the market for years, if ever – neither milk would solve ‘the problem’ of cow’s milk allergy/sensitivity, as there really is no such thing as ‘cow’s milk allergy/sensitivity’.

What is, in fact, relatively common (especially, among babies and small children) are a whole range of different sensitivities (whether immediate, IgE mediated or delayed) to a number of different cow’s milk proteins and their components parts or ‘epitopes’. (There are over 30 proteins in cow’s milk and each one includes many ‘epitopes’ so the options are almost endless.) In other words, which protein or fraction of a protein you react to is entirely individual to you, your reactions may be caused by a series of different immune activities and those reactions may vary according to your age!

So although, given the numbers that we are talking about, there will be a significant number of people who do react to A1 milk, so would be fine with A2, and another signficant group who do react to beta-lactoglobulin (the protein that has been genetically engineered out of Daisy) so will be fine with Daisy’s milk, there will still be very signifcant groups who will not be fine with either.

Not only does this rather dent the ‘dairy allergy is no more’ headlines but it creates yet greater confusion in an area which is already horrendously confused. Very few cow’s milk allergy/sensitivity sufferers will really understand the science or have any kind of handle on which group they fall into, or whether the new milks will actually help them.  It also significantly raises the risk of serious allergic reactions amongst those who do suffer from IgE mediated allergies to a cow’s milk protein other than A1 but get carried away by the hype and end up by drinking, for example, A2 milk on the assumption that it is safe for them – which it most certainly will not be.

And that is totally ignoring the whole question of lactose intolerance on which neither milk would have any effect at all.

There is already massive confusion between lactose intolerance (an inability to digest the lactose sugar in milk because you do not make enough of the enzyme lactase needed to process it) and cow’s milk intolerance (a reaction to one or several of the proteins in milk).  Claims by A2 milk supporters that it may  improve lactose intolerance are nonsense – unless the supposed lactose intolerance symptoms have not been caused by lactose intolerance at all but by an intolerance to the A1 proteins in the milk, in which case, moving to A2 milk might indeed resolve the symptoms. But try explaining that to someone who understands nothing of the mechanics of either….

It is great that the research is going forward – and yes please, more, more….. but a sad fact of life that, in the understandable rush to publish results (which may help to raise money to fund more research), unrealistic hopes are raised which are more likely to hinder than to help the cause.

Category: Allergies, Conventional Medicine, Dairy-free, FoodTag: 30 proteins in cow's milk, A1 beta-casein, A1 milk and autism, A2 milk, A2 milk from Guernsey cows, A2 milk not relevant to lactose intolerance, Australian A2 milk, BCM7, beta-casomorphin-7, beta-lactoglobulin, CMA, Cow's milk allergy, cow's milk intolerance, danger of serious allergic reactions with A2 milk, Genetic modification, GM, GM of cattle, lactose intolerance, Type 1 diabetes

Previous Post: « FreeFrom pizza feeding frenzy!!
Next Post: Eosinophils – and helminths?…. »

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Jeemboh

    05/10/2012 at 14:11

    I suppose it brings us back to the ultimate truth about most allergy. If something is bad for you stay away from it. Much confusion would be a voided if people would accept this simple truth.

  2. Micki

    07/10/2012 at 16:23

    This illustrates rather well the point I keep raising about gluten too: that it’s ridiculous to believe there are just one or two fractions of the proteins we react to. Here we can see that this is more accepted in dairy circles (I like that image!) and you quite rightly say that avoiding one protein epitope/fraction and having another may not solve the problem at all. That’s partly why I believe so many coeliacs do not get as well as they should because they avoid 33-mer gliadin, which is what is tested by food producers of traditional gluten free food as far as I understand it, but there are many other fractions present (protein and non-protein) that could be causing an equal or even worse problem for them. Who’s to say it mightn’t be a combination of different fractions rather than just one? I think that’s more likely. We have SO much to learn but it is great to see at least some discussion of the various fractions going on.

    Onward…although I did gulp a bit there at the GMing of the cows! Splicing and manipulating our foods like this will inevitably cause a nightmare for food sensitives who will no longer be able to call an apple an apple because it has pear fractions in it etc.

  3. Ruth Holroyd

    11/10/2012 at 15:18

    Just seems like one big waste of money to me, just like the GM peanut that was also in the news recently. It could lead to cafes, restaurants and food manufacturers advertising their products as “Safe for dairy allergy sufferers” when it fact it very well may not be. I’m with Micki on this one. If you can’t drink milk? Avoidance is the only safe answer. I say NO to the GMooing of cows. (do you see what I did there?)

Trackbacks

  1. Mixed milky messages – again says:
    19/07/2017 at 13:15

    […] also covered the subject in rather more general terms back in April 2012 when headlines not only suggested that A2 milk was […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Colliding with a new reality – the hazards of low vision
  • Call for adult allergy sufferers
  • The vegan/allergy labelling issue
  • A gluten free Christmas just could be delicious – not a penance!
  • A food fad won’t kill you – an allergy will

Search this blog

ARCHIVES

Blogroll

  • Allergy Insight
  • Better brains, naturally
  • For Ever FreeFrom
  • Free From (gluten)
  • Freefrom Food Awards
  • Gluten-free Mrs D
  • Natural Health Worldwide
  • Pure Health Clinic
  • Skins Matter
  • The Helminthic Therapy Wiki
  • Truly Gluten Free
  • What Allergy?

TOPICS

A food fad won’t kill you – an allergy will

There has been a predictable outcry in the allergy world this week’s in response to Rachel Johnson’s piece in Thursday’s Evening Standard on ‘dietary requirements’ and food fads. Being charitable, I am assuming that she has never suffered from or lived with someone with a food allergy. However, I do have some sympathy with her …

Bioplastics – a solution or part of the problem?

Everyday Plastic is a social enterprise group using accessible learning and publicity campaigns to reduce the amount of plastics used daily in our society. It was founded by its current director Daniel Webb who, having moved to Margate in Kent in 2016, was horrified to discover that there were no plastic recycling options on offer.  …

FreeFrom Christmas Awards – the Winners

Since they were launched two years ago the FreeFrom Christmas Awards have been a great success. And how lucky are ‘freefrom-ers’ these days!  From Advent calendars to gifts, party food to Christmas dinner, there is no longer any need for them to miss out. Indeed, the whole family can happily eat freefrom and never know …

Do not extradite Julian Assange to the US

Julian Assange is being sought by the current US administration for publishing US government documents which exposed war crimes and human rights abuses. The politically motivated charges represent an unprecedented attack on press freedom and the public’s right to know – seeking to criminalise basic journalistic activity. Assange is facing a 175-year sentence for publishing …

What to believe – applying critical thought

For the average citizen evaluating the claims made for cure all – or even improve all – health products and procedures has always been difficult. Not only is it an area in which we have minimal expertise but most of us have a vested interest in finding a miracle intervention that will solve our health …

Could wireless monitoring devices be killing racehorses?

Regular readers may remember that back in August last year I alerted you to a posting on Arthur Firstenberg’s Cellphone Task Force site about phone masts and bird flu. Could there be a connection between the fact that the two wildlife sites in Holland and Northern France which had suffered catastrophic bird flu deaths were …

Site Footer

Copyright © 2025 · Michelle's Blog · Michelle Berridale Johnson · Site design by DigitalJen·