• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

Michelle's blog

Food allergy and food intolerance, freefrom foods, electrosensitivity, this and that...

  • Home
  • Blog
  • About
  • FreeFrom Food Awards
  • Foods Matter
  • Walks & Gardens
  • Salon Music
  • Home
  • Blog
  • About
  • FreeFrom Food Awards
  • Foods Matter
  • Walks & Gardens
  • Salon Music

Food labelling – are we any less confused?…

15/09/2011 //  by Michelle Berridale Johnson//  Leave a Comment

This morning’s publication of DEFRA’s new guidelines is welcome in that it discourages the use of ‘display until’ and ‘sell by’  marks on food – of no value to the consumer, merely designed to help the retailer with their stock control. But does it really help the befuddled consumer to know how long they can keep a food before they need to add it to the 8.3 millions tonnes of food waste that we mange to accumulate each year because they have not got round to eating it?

We are left with ‘Best before’ and ‘Use by’, the first of which relates to the eating quality of the food, the second to whether or not it is likely to poison you. But, if you had just landed from Mars – or even from Europe – would that be clear to you? Maybe I am particularly dull, but the subtlety escapes me.  I know that both are slightly longer (a very BAD thing in the eyes of food packagers) but would not ‘Tastes best before’ and ‘Safe until’ not be a lot clearer?

Which? makes the same point in their press release this morning:
In an online survey of 1,009 members of the GB public carried out by Which? in June 2011, 46% said they were consciously trying to waste less food. Half of those are checking ‘use by’  dates more, so they throw away less food. However, nearly 4 in 10 (37%) have stopped adhering to some ‘use by’ dates, instead using other means of checking whether food has gone off, like whether the food looks and smells alright. But you cannot identify harmful bacteria this way. Which? wants DEFRA and the FSA … to ensure that there is no room for confusion.

(For those who are interested in consumer understanding of labeling there is an interesting passage in the WRAP report on consumer behaviour in relation to labeling although this is now quite old [2007] so it is to be hoped that understanding may have moved on. See page 3 – Executive report – Guidance dates: Understanding of dates.)

I do understand that labeling is an incredibly difficult and contentious area, and nowhere more so than in labelling food for allergens but it is SO important for consumers, especially for allergic consumers,  to get it right.  Good work is being done in terms of the major life threatening allergies and the dreaded ‘may contain’ warning with manufacturers giving much more specific information about contamination levels: ‘made in a factory which also uses nuts’ rather than just ‘may contain nuts’ is already a good start. But there are still no regulations governing this information so it remains patchily applied.

Moreover, even though the declaration of major allergens in ingredients lists is now mandatory, there are no regulations governing ‘freefrom’ flashes on the front of packs – ‘gluten free’, ‘milk free’,’nut free’ etc. And although the survey of freefrom shoppers that we carried out at last year’s Allergy Show was in no way scientific, it indicated that 80% of shoppers wanted to see these flashes on the front of packs and would rely on them rather than checking the ingredients list.

Caveat – oh allergic – emptor…..

 

Category: Food/Health PolicyTag: allergic consumers, best before, consumer behaviour in labeling, DEFRA guidelines, food labeling, Food/health policy, Freefrom food/recipes, use by, WRAP report

Previous Post: « Childcare – and hugging your non-allergic child
Next Post: Bravo for BMW – or is it?….. »

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Colliding with a new reality – the hazards of low vision
  • Call for adult allergy sufferers
  • The vegan/allergy labelling issue
  • A gluten free Christmas just could be delicious – not a penance!
  • A food fad won’t kill you – an allergy will

Search this blog

ARCHIVES

Blogroll

  • Allergy Insight
  • Better brains, naturally
  • For Ever FreeFrom
  • Free From (gluten)
  • Freefrom Food Awards
  • Gluten-free Mrs D
  • Natural Health Worldwide
  • Pure Health Clinic
  • Skins Matter
  • The Helminthic Therapy Wiki
  • Truly Gluten Free
  • What Allergy?

TOPICS

A food fad won’t kill you – an allergy will

There has been a predictable outcry in the allergy world this week’s in response to Rachel Johnson’s piece in Thursday’s Evening Standard on ‘dietary requirements’ and food fads. Being charitable, I am assuming that she has never suffered from or lived with someone with a food allergy. However, I do have some sympathy with her …

Bioplastics – a solution or part of the problem?

Everyday Plastic is a social enterprise group using accessible learning and publicity campaigns to reduce the amount of plastics used daily in our society. It was founded by its current director Daniel Webb who, having moved to Margate in Kent in 2016, was horrified to discover that there were no plastic recycling options on offer.  …

FreeFrom Christmas Awards – the Winners

Since they were launched two years ago the FreeFrom Christmas Awards have been a great success. And how lucky are ‘freefrom-ers’ these days!  From Advent calendars to gifts, party food to Christmas dinner, there is no longer any need for them to miss out. Indeed, the whole family can happily eat freefrom and never know …

Do not extradite Julian Assange to the US

Julian Assange is being sought by the current US administration for publishing US government documents which exposed war crimes and human rights abuses. The politically motivated charges represent an unprecedented attack on press freedom and the public’s right to know – seeking to criminalise basic journalistic activity. Assange is facing a 175-year sentence for publishing …

What to believe – applying critical thought

For the average citizen evaluating the claims made for cure all – or even improve all – health products and procedures has always been difficult. Not only is it an area in which we have minimal expertise but most of us have a vested interest in finding a miracle intervention that will solve our health …

Could wireless monitoring devices be killing racehorses?

Regular readers may remember that back in August last year I alerted you to a posting on Arthur Firstenberg’s Cellphone Task Force site about phone masts and bird flu. Could there be a connection between the fact that the two wildlife sites in Holland and Northern France which had suffered catastrophic bird flu deaths were …

Site Footer

Copyright © 2025 · Michelle's Blog · Michelle Berridale Johnson · Site design by DigitalJen·