• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

Michelle's blog

Food allergy and food intolerance, freefrom foods, electrosensitivity, this and that...

  • Home
  • Blog
  • About
  • FreeFrom Food Awards
  • Foods Matter
  • Walks & Gardens
  • Salon Music
  • Home
  • Blog
  • About
  • FreeFrom Food Awards
  • Foods Matter
  • Walks & Gardens
  • Salon Music

How could raw milk reduce lactose intolerance?……

02/05/2014 //  by Michelle Berridale Johnson//  5 Comments

cowWorking my way just now through a backlog of John Scott’s excellent research reports I came across this one:
Sarah Mummah, MPhil, Beibei Oelrich, MD, PhD, Jessica Hope, MSN, NP, Quyen Vu, BAH and Christopher D. Gardner, PhD, Effect of Raw Milk on Lactose Intolerance: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study, Ann Fam Med March/April 2014, doi: 10.1370/afm.1618. The trial was funded by the Weston A. Price Foundation and by Stanford’s Program in Human Biology.

Why?…. Yes, I know that some of those who have difficulty with ‘standard’ milk find that they can drink raw milk without any discomfort – and no doubt there are those who have claimed that their ‘lactose intolerance’ was cured by drinking raw milk. But all milks, cow, goat, sheep or human, be they raw or pasteurised, contain lactose. Lactose is a sugar present in milk which is completely unaffected by the pasteurisation. If you do not have sufficient of the enzyme lactase with which to digest the lactose sugar in the milk it will cause you digestive discomfort – whether it is raw or pasteurised. This is a fact, and one that is totally undisputed – and how rare is that in the world of allergy/sensitivity?

So why on earth were the Weston A. Price Foundation and Stanford’s Program in Human Biology doing a trial to discover whether  drinking raw milk would improve the symptoms of someone who was lactose intolerant when pasteurisation is irrelevant to the ability of lactose  to cause unpleasant symptoms in those who cannot tolerate it because of a dearth of  the lactose enzyme? Why were they not, instead, looking at some of the other properties of raw milk versus pasteurised to see if they could find out why those who thrive on it do so when they cannot tolerate the pasteurised stuff?

Maybe I have missed something here but this seems to me a total waste of good money and research time – neither of which are exactly abundant. I am really surprised at the Weston Price Foundation.

 

 

close

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Category: Alternative/Complementary Health, Conventional Medicine, Environmental IssuesTag: lactase enzyme helps digest lactose sugar in milk, lactose sugar in all animal milks, raw milk, raw milk and lactose intolerance, raw milk contains lactose sugar, raw mloik does not help lactose intolerance, Stanford's Human Biology programme, Weston Price foundation

Previous Post: « The horrors of foie gras
Next Post: Low blood sugar and aggression – and ‘dirty’ fruit and veg »

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Alex Gazzola

    02/05/2014 at 19:20

    Perhaps they thought some naturally present bacteria in the raw milk may ‘digest’ the lactose (as happens with probiotics in yoghurt), and thus reduce symptoms?

    As we can test lactose levels to 70ppm (I learned recently) then I’m baffled why they just didn’t look at lactose content, instead of conducting a pilot human trial. Some other component in raw milk theoretically capable of mitigating effects of lactose in the lactase deficient?

    I agree that there are more interesting things to look at when it comes to milk: setting aside CMPA, milk allergy and lactose intolerance, there are no other known sensitivities to milk – and yet many claim to suffer nasal symptoms / mucus production when inadvertently consuming milk. Is this a genuine adverse reaction? What is the mechanism? Who knows … but why aren’t we properly looking into it?

  2. Michelle

    02/05/2014 at 19:32

    Absolutely………

  3. Jeemboh

    02/05/2014 at 19:36

    Maybe they were testing the hypothesis that there are enzymes in un-pasteursied milk which help the gut deal deal more successfully with lactose. The fact that the study turned out negative doesn’t necessarily mean it wasn’t worth doing?

  4. Clarissa

    10/05/2014 at 18:09

    Hello, I agree, as my family has been using Raw Milk for awhile now and if anything it makes my symptoms WORSE. My son thrives on it, but he also can’t have too much dairy of any kind or he gets constipated and can get more susceptible to colds. I can use butter and cream though and I use it raw. I tolerate some goat’s milk products but not aged cheeses or yogurts because of histamine issues. So using “raw milk” is NOT a panacea for those who have milk-digestion issues, no, thanks for pointing this out to those who might get stuck thinking it should. 🙂

  5. Michelle

    10/05/2014 at 19:42

    Hi Clarissa – my personal opinion is that if you are going to drink animal milk of any kind it would be better to drink it raw – provided, of course, you are sure it comes from a well run, hygienic dairy. As far as you are concerned, shame about the histamine issues as of course seriously aged cheese such as Parmesan have virtually no lactose left – see this article by dietitain Anita MacDonald.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Homeopathy – a second string to our vaccination bow?
  • Sad, sad news
  • Are COVID vaccines safe for those with allergies?
  • Disastrous Brexit fallout for medical cannabis users
  • The trouble about gluten-free oats

Search this blog

ARCHIVES

Blogroll

  • Allergy Insight
  • Better brains, naturally
  • For Ever FreeFrom
  • Free From (gluten)
  • Freefrom Food Awards
  • Gluten-free Mrs D
  • Natural Health Worldwide
  • Pure Health Clinic
  • Skins Matter
  • The Helminthic Therapy Wiki
  • Truly Gluten Free
  • What Allergy?

TOPICS

The trouble about gluten-free oats

Oats are delicious – oats are nutritious – they contain high levels of vitamins, minerals and antioxidants and are an excellent source of fibre – they do not contain the protein gliadin, the gluten fraction that coeliacs need to avoid – they add texture to gluten free baking and are easy to cook with. Few …

Happy, if distanced, Christmas!

After this very strange and, for many people, horribly difficult year I wanted to wish you all a very peaceful, safe, healthy and hopefully happy Christmas. And offer you a little allergic chortle. Those of you who used to receive the FoodsMatter magazine will remember all of Christopher’s wonderful allergy related cartoons – the caption …

Good news for those with peanut allergy

The news may be grim on the virus front but there have been two bits of good news this month for those with peanut allergy. Earlier in the month The Journal of Allergy and Immunology: In Practice reported on on a trial which demonstrated that peanut oral immunotherapy is still effective after one year of …

Is it time to subject Vitamin C to serious scientific scrutiny?

Ever since 1970 when the Nobel Laureate Linus Pauling claimed that gram dose vitamin C supplementation could prevent and alleviate the common cold, the argument has rumbled on – how effective can vitamin C supplementation be for respiratory infections both mild (such as the common cold) or more acute (pneumonia and, maybe, COVID19). The evidence …

Share a meal

Yes, indeed – what a lovely thing to be able to do – and one that we have been deprived of for all too long. But, we don’t have to be. Over lockdown my good friend Sarah Stacey, who lives in a tiny village in Dorset, started cooking meals for a poorly neighbour. Talking to …

The importance of nutrition in children’s food

A few weeks ago I posted about our revamped Child and Teen Friendly Food category in this year’s FreeFrom Food Awards in which we are trying to tease out what children really think about the nutritional content of their food. So I was especially interested in an alert from FAB (Food and Behaviour Research) about …

Copyright © 2021 · Michelle's Blog · Michelle Berridale Johnson · Site design by DigitalJen·