• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

Michelle's blog

Food allergy and food intolerance, freefrom foods, electrosensitivity, this and that...

  • Home
  • Blog
  • About
  • FreeFrom Food Awards
  • Foods Matter
  • Walks & Gardens
  • Salon Music
  • Home
  • Blog
  • About
  • FreeFrom Food Awards
  • Foods Matter
  • Walks & Gardens
  • Salon Music

If it is vegan, is it safe for those with allergies to milk or eggs?

17/07/2023 //  by Michelle Berridale Johnson//  1 Comment

The Chartered Trading Standards Institute (CTSI) has just issued a report, discussed in an excellent post on Alex Gazzola’s Allergy Insight blog, which makes it quite clear that being labelled vegan does not mean that a food is safe for those with allergies to milk or eggs. They found that over 30% of foods labelled ‘vegan’ had traces of milk or egg. And a trace is quite enough to kill someone who is seriously allergic to either, as in the case of Celia Marsh who died in 2017 after eating a ‘vegan’ flatbread which contained traces of milk.

The vegan revolution has been great for the ‘freefrom’ community in many ways. As we saw in this year’s FreeFrom Food Awards it has enormously increased the range of milk and egg free foods on offer and has stimulated new product development in areas like vegan ‘cheese’ which has resulted in some really excellent products. But it comes, for now at least, with this potentially fatal sting in the tail: not only may 30% of those foods be contaminated, but three quarters of consumers are not aware that they might be. Fine if only your conscience is at risk – totally not fine if it is your life.

One of the issues for the freefrom community is that the Vegan Society do not see contamination as a problem – although they do recognise that it is one for those who are allergic. For them it is all in the ‘intent’ – so as long as you did not ‘mean’ your product to contain dairy or egg, if it picks up a bit on the way that is not an issue.

Personally, I cannot see that this makes much sense. Either you do want to eat animal products or you don’t. How great the amount and whether it was there on purpose or by accident does not really seem to be relevant. As it happens that is (or at least was) the government/Food Standards Agency view. Guidance issued in 2016 and highlighted by Alex in his blog specifically states that:

Manufacturers, retailers and caterers should be able to demonstrate that foods presented as ‘vegetarian’ or ‘vegan’ have not been contaminated with non-vegetarian or non-vegan foods during storage, preparation, cooking or display.

However, as Alex points out, this never appears to have been enforced and has now been quietly dropped.

Theshholds

While no solution is ever perfect, this situation could be made so much more manageable if only the thresholds for allergen reactions, which have been being discussed for the last 20 years, could actually be agreed.

A threshold for a reaction is the milligram amount of an allergic protein that can be consumed by all except the most sensitive of the allergic population without them suffering an adverse reaction.

The importance of this to both the allergic community and the food industry is that it gives them both a level of contamination to which they can work, just as they currently have for gluten. So while it is 10 parts per million for gluten, it could be 2 parts or 5 parts per million for peanuts or egg or milk. But whatever it is manufacturers have some certainty on what is allowed and can be tested for and either their product meets that requirement or it doesn’t. If it does then the product is free of that allergen and can claim to be so, if it doesn’t then it isn’t and it can’t.

Reseach on these levels started in Australia in 2005 under the VITAL programme.  Since then programme has established what are known as ‘reference doses’ for all of the major allergens. Various European initiatives over the last 15 years, have replicated much of this research and there is now pretty general agreement on what thresholds could be safely enforced. The difficulty lies in translating that research into regulation – and sadly little progress appears to be being made on that front.

Farewell to ‘may contain’

Were such regulations to exist not only would the issue of whether a vegan manufacturer ‘intended’ there to be milk or eggs in their products be irrelevant but so would the dreaded ‘may contain’ precautionary labels which create so much frustation within the food allergic community.

Since ‘may contain’ gives you no reliable indication of whether or not the product does contain the allergen and if so, how much, every time a food allergic person is faced with a ‘may contain’ warning they have to:

  • Be super cautious and not consume it just in case, even though the risk may actually be extremely low, thereby significantly reducing their food choice.
  • Throw caution to the winds and eat it anyhow, possibly risking a serious, or even fatal, reaction.
  • Spend long hours on the phone with the manufacturer trying to establish what the level of risk actually is.

Roll on the day….

Category: Allergies, Coeliac/celiac disease, Dairy-free, Food, Food/Health Policy, FreeFrom Food, Peanut allergy, VeganTag: 'may contain' labelling, Alex Gazzola, Alex Gazzola at Allergy Insight, Allergy thresholds, confusion surrounding 'may contain' warnings on food, may contain warnings and the food industry, precautionary allergen labelling, risk of may contain warnings for allergic consumers, risks of vegan food for milk and egg allergics, vegan food, vegan foods and egg allergy, vegan foods and milk allergy, vegan labelling, VITAL allergy programme

Previous Post: « Transforming Primary Healthcare
Next Post: Customer service »

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Grace

    19/07/2023 at 17:08

    Thank you, Michelle, this is an excellent article. It’s such an important issue and yet seems to continually be swept under the carpet. Many thanks for bringing it to the fore!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Colliding with a new reality – the hazards of low vision
  • Call for adult allergy sufferers
  • The vegan/allergy labelling issue
  • A gluten free Christmas just could be delicious – not a penance!
  • A food fad won’t kill you – an allergy will

Search this blog

ARCHIVES

Blogroll

  • Allergy Insight
  • Better brains, naturally
  • For Ever FreeFrom
  • Free From (gluten)
  • Freefrom Food Awards
  • Gluten-free Mrs D
  • Natural Health Worldwide
  • Pure Health Clinic
  • Skins Matter
  • The Helminthic Therapy Wiki
  • Truly Gluten Free
  • What Allergy?

TOPICS

A food fad won’t kill you – an allergy will

There has been a predictable outcry in the allergy world this week’s in response to Rachel Johnson’s piece in Thursday’s Evening Standard on ‘dietary requirements’ and food fads. Being charitable, I am assuming that she has never suffered from or lived with someone with a food allergy. However, I do have some sympathy with her …

Bioplastics – a solution or part of the problem?

Everyday Plastic is a social enterprise group using accessible learning and publicity campaigns to reduce the amount of plastics used daily in our society. It was founded by its current director Daniel Webb who, having moved to Margate in Kent in 2016, was horrified to discover that there were no plastic recycling options on offer.  …

FreeFrom Christmas Awards – the Winners

Since they were launched two years ago the FreeFrom Christmas Awards have been a great success. And how lucky are ‘freefrom-ers’ these days!  From Advent calendars to gifts, party food to Christmas dinner, there is no longer any need for them to miss out. Indeed, the whole family can happily eat freefrom and never know …

Do not extradite Julian Assange to the US

Julian Assange is being sought by the current US administration for publishing US government documents which exposed war crimes and human rights abuses. The politically motivated charges represent an unprecedented attack on press freedom and the public’s right to know – seeking to criminalise basic journalistic activity. Assange is facing a 175-year sentence for publishing …

What to believe – applying critical thought

For the average citizen evaluating the claims made for cure all – or even improve all – health products and procedures has always been difficult. Not only is it an area in which we have minimal expertise but most of us have a vested interest in finding a miracle intervention that will solve our health …

Could wireless monitoring devices be killing racehorses?

Regular readers may remember that back in August last year I alerted you to a posting on Arthur Firstenberg’s Cellphone Task Force site about phone masts and bird flu. Could there be a connection between the fact that the two wildlife sites in Holland and Northern France which had suffered catastrophic bird flu deaths were …

Site Footer

Copyright © 2025 · Michelle's Blog · Michelle Berridale Johnson · Site design by DigitalJen·