• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

Michelle's blog

Food allergy and food intolerance, freefrom foods, electrosensitivity, this and that...

  • Home
  • Blog
  • About
  • FreeFrom Food Awards
  • Foods Matter
  • Walks & Gardens
  • Salon Music
  • Home
  • Blog
  • About
  • FreeFrom Food Awards
  • Foods Matter
  • Walks & Gardens
  • Salon Music

Sugar success

17/03/2016 //  by Michelle Berridale Johnson//  2 Comments

sugar cube jumping into te copyGeorge Osborne’s surprise new sugar tax has been greeted with the predictable chorus of glad cries from health campaigners, howls of derision from industry and healthy scepticism from commentators. But whatever the chancellor’s motives (and such is the repute in which he is held that no one believes that he does not have some ulterior political motive) I do believe that the health campaigners are right to be pleased.

It is not that sugar taxes are guaranteed to reduce obesity (the evidence seems to be mixed) and it may even be that, as the leader in the Independent suggests, ‘that it will deprive  poorer families of spending power if they have to pay more for their children’s soft drinks (although the tax  is designed so that, in theory, this should not happen)…. so that the net effect  may simply be a transfer spending power from the poorer to the wealthier and, for that matter, from the fat to the slim.’

But it does suggest that government is prepared to come down hard on industry for once instead of leaving them to self regulate. What this means is that serious effort will now be put into lowering the sugar content of fizzy drinks while maintaining their taste and appeal – and thus their market. (Industry has already done that with salt. When, heavily prodded by Dr Graham MacGregor and his CASH – Consensus Action on Salt –  campaign, they more than halved the salt in the average loaf of bread over a ten year period without anyone even noticing.)  All good…..

It also another proof of the power of direct (well, at least direct celeb/internet) action – as I pointed out in my last blog about petitions…..  This is the second time that HM Gov. has caved in to a health campaign led by Jamie Oliver, ‘more power to him’ as they would say across the Irish Sea.  The first one over school meals and now over sugar. This does not mean, of course, that all is now perfect in the school meal world – far from it. And the sugar tax is certainly not going to solve childhood obesity. But….. It moves the argument forward, gets the problem out there and forces those involved to actually engage with it. Again, all good….

For those interested in the sugar question, a great article coming up on the FoodsMatter site next week from Margaret Moss on that very subject. Or you could take look at the report of this fascinating conference run by the British Society for Environmental Medicine last autumn – Sugar…. the Brain, the Microbiome and Cancer – which includes a presentation from US sugar campaigner, Dr Robert Lustig.

close

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Category: Behavioural conditions / autism, Food, Food/Health Policy, Peanut allergy, Politics, SugarTag: British Society for Environmental Medicine, CASH consensus action on Salt and health, Dr Graham MacGregor, Dr Robert Lustig at the BSEM, Jamie Oliver school food campaign, Jamie Oliver sugar campaign, sugar, SUGAR - The Brain, tax on sugar in fizzy drinks, The Independent, the Microbiome and Cancer, the power of petitions, UK new sugar tax, will a sugar tax reduce obesity

Previous Post: « Up for signing a few petitions?…..
Next Post: Random thoughts on food crime, sentencing for food crime – and a mental health charity…. »

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Micki

    17/03/2016 at 10:21

    I really welcome it, Michelle, but I have a horrible feeling it will just mean more use of artificial sweeteners, some of which equally trick the insulin-control system and the body reacts in the same way as sugar ie. it gains belly fat. I’d rather people had sugar but much less of it, that we had less of a nanny state need for food control, that people took more care with what they put in their mouths and that manufacturers cared more about what they sell to people. I am happy out here in cloud-cuckoo land! Something is better than nothing.

  2. Michelle

    17/03/2016 at 10:27

    You are so right re the artificial sweeteners – but anything, I guess, is better than nothing!!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Novel food proteins – do they pose a risk to food allergics?
  • The dairy wars
  • In memory of Pat Schooling
  • FSA – on the allergy case
  • Homeopathy – a second string to our vaccination bow?

Search this blog

ARCHIVES

Blogroll

  • Allergy Insight
  • Better brains, naturally
  • For Ever FreeFrom
  • Free From (gluten)
  • Freefrom Food Awards
  • Gluten-free Mrs D
  • Natural Health Worldwide
  • Pure Health Clinic
  • Skins Matter
  • The Helminthic Therapy Wiki
  • Truly Gluten Free
  • What Allergy?

TOPICS

Homeopathy – a second string to our vaccination bow?

Cuba has always had a very individualistic– and on the whole very successful – approach to public and population health. The hard line socialist nature of their politics, especially in early days after the revolution, resulted in very high levels of education and medical care – but also in isolation from much of the developed …

Sad, sad news

Yesterday evening, Lisa Acton – co founder, with her husband John Burke, of the Irish FreeFrom Food Awards – finally lost a long and heroic battle with cancer. To my regret I had only met her a few times. A couple of years ago when John brought the whole family to a FreeFrom Food Awards …

Are COVID vaccines safe for those with allergies?

Allergy reactors are, understandably, worried as to whether they should accept a vaccination if and when it is offered. After consultation with the BSACI (British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology) the MHRA (Medicines  and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency) have updated their original warning that those with allergies to vaccines, drugs and food should not …

Disastrous Brexit fallout for medical cannabis users

Thanks to the tireless campaigning of a group of  ‘epilepsy mothers’, lead by Hannah Deacon, the mother of Alfie Dingley, and her consultant, neurologist Professor Mike Barnes, a change in the law in 2018 allowed the prescription of medical cannabis for children with certain rare types of epilepsy, those in chronic pain and for those …

The trouble about gluten-free oats

Oats are delicious – oats are nutritious – they contain high levels of vitamins, minerals and antioxidants and are an excellent source of fibre – they do not contain the protein gliadin, the gluten fraction that coeliacs need to avoid – they add texture to gluten free baking and are easy to cook with. Few …

Happy, if distanced, Christmas!

After this very strange and, for many people, horribly difficult year I wanted to wish you all a very peaceful, safe, healthy and hopefully happy Christmas. And offer you a little allergic chortle. Those of you who used to receive the FoodsMatter magazine will remember all of Christopher’s wonderful allergy related cartoons – the caption …

Copyright © 2021 · Michelle's Blog · Michelle Berridale Johnson · Site design by DigitalJen·