• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

Michelle's blog

Food allergy and food intolerance, freefrom foods, electrosensitivity, this and that...

  • Home
  • Blog
  • About
  • FreeFrom Food Awards
  • Foods Matter
  • Walks & Gardens
  • Salon Music
  • Home
  • Blog
  • About
  • FreeFrom Food Awards
  • Foods Matter
  • Walks & Gardens
  • Salon Music

When to start eating peanuts…..

11/01/2017 //  by Michelle Berridale Johnson//  Leave a Comment

peanuts-in-shellEarly in 2015 the peanut allergy world was stunned by the results of the LEAP study conducted by Professor Gideon Lack and his team at King’s College in London.

Over 600 four to 11 month old babies at high risk of peanut allergy (coming from families with a high incidence of allergy) been randomised either to avoid peanuts or to consume them for five years, up to the age of five. And while 17% of the children who avoided peanuts had developed a peanut allergy by the age of five, only 3% of the children who had been eating peanuts had developed an allergy. In other words, regular consumption of peanuts from the time of weaning till the age of five led to an 81% reduction in  the risk of peanut allergy amongst high risk children.

Results from the continuation LEAP-ON study which came out in March 2016 suggested that this tolerance would be sustained. Amongst 556 of the original cohort who then avoided peanut from the age five for one year, only 4.8% of the peanuts consumers were found to be allergic at the end of the year in which they had not eaten them, while 18.6% of the peanut avoiders were allergic.

(For those interested in the genesis of such studies, it arose from a visit made by Professor Lack some years ago to Israel where he addressed a group of paediatricians on the subject of peanut allergy. His talk was greeted by a sea of blank faces as peanut allergy is all but unheard of in paediatric populations in Israel. Further investigation revealed that mashed peanut was widely used as a weaning food for Israeli babies between  the ages of 8 and 14 months; the parents of similar aged children in the UK were specifically warned never to feed their children peanuts. Professor Lack and his team decided to test the peanut-as-a-weaning-food theory out on British children.)

As always, it takes a while for the results of such research to work its way through into medical practice and while Public Health England and the NHS are no longer telling parents not to feed their children peanuts, neither are they yet telling them to do so. However, across the pond in the US the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases have been a touch speedier and have just issued new guidelines suggesting that:

  • Children with other allergies or severe eczema should start on peanut-containing foods at between four and six months old, with medical supervision
  • Babies with mild eczema should have peanut-containing food at about six months old
  • Those with no eczema or allergies can have peanut-containing food freely introduced

Hopefully, the UK will catch up soon. While waiting for them to do so, UK parents who fear that their children may be at risk of peanut allergy and would  like to follow the new advice, should talk to their GPs and point them in the direction of the American guidelines and the results of the LEAP study.

Meanwhile, or course, there has been concern that in their enthusiasm to feed their infants peanuts, parents should not feed them whole peanuts because of the risk of choking. There has also been concern  that the new guidelines will be misunderstood. A piece in the Huffington Post last week described how the father of a pre-teen with a peanut allergy had read the study and, as a result had been feeding his son tiny bits of peanut and had been seeing ‘mini responses, which had been escalating’ – whatever that may have meant.

Of course feeding a peanut-allergic pre-teen bits of peanut is not at all what the guidelines are advising and certainly is not what any doctor would advise – quite the opposite. But dangerous though this practice could be, the concept is not that far out.

Oral immunotherapy does involve exactly that, feeding an allergic person very tiny, but slowly escalating, amounts of the food to which they are allergic in the hope of gradually educating their immune system to recognise it as friend rather than foe. The difference is that the amounts of the allergen used are tiny (micrograms, not ‘tiny bits’) and that it is only done under tightly controlled medical supervision lest a reaction should occur. However, it does appear to work, both for peanuts and for other allergens. And even if allergy sufferer never reaches the point where they could comfortably consume a peanut butter sandwich, as long as their sensitivity is reduced to a level at which they will not react to traces of the allergen, their quality of life will be enormously improved.

(If anyone wishes to follow up on immunotherapy research there have been a number of studies over the last few years that suggest that it can be successful: see this study and this study from 2014, and another one from 2014 although improvement may not always be sustained; this study on OIT combined with probiotics from 2015 and two more, one from 2015 assessing the efficacy of the treatment and this one from 2016 on who may or may not react well to immunotherapy.)

For much, much more on peanut allergy and for hundreds of research reports see this section of the Foodsmatter site.

Category: Allergies, Conventional Medicine, Food, Food/Health Policy, Peanut allergyTag: 81% reduction in the risk of peanut allergy, Israeli babies have peanut as weaning food, LEAP study on peanut allergy, LEAP-ON study, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases guidelines of peanut allergy, OIT for peanut allergy, Oral immunotherapy, peanut allergy section of FoodsMatter site, Peanut/treenut allergy, Professor Gideon Lack, Professor Gideon Lack and team at King's College, Public Health England guidance on peanut allergy, Risk of feeding infants whole peanuts, success or oral immunotherapy

Previous Post: « Christmas ramblings….
Next Post: Walking the Himalayas »

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Colliding with a new reality – the hazards of low vision
  • Call for adult allergy sufferers
  • The vegan/allergy labelling issue
  • A gluten free Christmas just could be delicious – not a penance!
  • A food fad won’t kill you – an allergy will

Search this blog

ARCHIVES

Blogroll

  • Allergy Insight
  • Better brains, naturally
  • For Ever FreeFrom
  • Free From (gluten)
  • Freefrom Food Awards
  • Gluten-free Mrs D
  • Natural Health Worldwide
  • Pure Health Clinic
  • Skins Matter
  • The Helminthic Therapy Wiki
  • Truly Gluten Free
  • What Allergy?

TOPICS

A food fad won’t kill you – an allergy will

There has been a predictable outcry in the allergy world this week’s in response to Rachel Johnson’s piece in Thursday’s Evening Standard on ‘dietary requirements’ and food fads. Being charitable, I am assuming that she has never suffered from or lived with someone with a food allergy. However, I do have some sympathy with her …

Bioplastics – a solution or part of the problem?

Everyday Plastic is a social enterprise group using accessible learning and publicity campaigns to reduce the amount of plastics used daily in our society. It was founded by its current director Daniel Webb who, having moved to Margate in Kent in 2016, was horrified to discover that there were no plastic recycling options on offer.  …

FreeFrom Christmas Awards – the Winners

Since they were launched two years ago the FreeFrom Christmas Awards have been a great success. And how lucky are ‘freefrom-ers’ these days!  From Advent calendars to gifts, party food to Christmas dinner, there is no longer any need for them to miss out. Indeed, the whole family can happily eat freefrom and never know …

Do not extradite Julian Assange to the US

Julian Assange is being sought by the current US administration for publishing US government documents which exposed war crimes and human rights abuses. The politically motivated charges represent an unprecedented attack on press freedom and the public’s right to know – seeking to criminalise basic journalistic activity. Assange is facing a 175-year sentence for publishing …

What to believe – applying critical thought

For the average citizen evaluating the claims made for cure all – or even improve all – health products and procedures has always been difficult. Not only is it an area in which we have minimal expertise but most of us have a vested interest in finding a miracle intervention that will solve our health …

Could wireless monitoring devices be killing racehorses?

Regular readers may remember that back in August last year I alerted you to a posting on Arthur Firstenberg’s Cellphone Task Force site about phone masts and bird flu. Could there be a connection between the fact that the two wildlife sites in Holland and Northern France which had suffered catastrophic bird flu deaths were …

Site Footer

Copyright © 2025 · Michelle's Blog · Michelle Berridale Johnson · Site design by DigitalJen·