• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

Michelle's blog

Food allergy and food intolerance, freefrom foods, electrosensitivity, this and that...

  • Home
  • Blog
  • About
  • FreeFrom Food Awards
  • Foods Matter
  • Walks & Gardens
  • Salon Music
  • Home
  • Blog
  • About
  • FreeFrom Food Awards
  • Foods Matter
  • Walks & Gardens
  • Salon Music

Labelling confusion – oats – are they, or aren’t they, allergens?

10/02/2019 //  by Michelle Berridale Johnson//  7 Comments

Yesterday we finished the judging for this year’s FreeFrom Food Awards. Over 500 products judged over three weeks by 57 different judges – and that’s not counting 10 children!! (The shortlist will be out next week so keep an eye on the awards site.) Here are some of the Store Cupboard entries lined up in the store rooms waiting for their moment in the sun.


Some really excellent products entered – we all thoroughly enjoyed ourselves – and now feel distinctly fatter than we did three weeks ago!!

However, the judging was not without its moments of disagreement – not, normally, about winners but about the ever-fraught topic of labelling. What do precautionary ‘may contain’ warnings actually mean (a topic for a different blog…) – and what about oats? How should they appear in an ingredients list? How indeed!! And how should an oat-sensitive coeliac ‘read’ them?

In an attempt to elucidate this for one of our entrants I have just written the following. Do not attempt to read unless you have had at least two cups of coffee and are feeling very ‘switched in’….

How should oats be listed in an ingredients list?

The regulations state that:

‘You need to tell your customers if any food products you sell or provide contain any of the main 14 allergens as an ingredient. The 14 allergens are:’

  • ‘Celery’
  • ‘Cereals containing gluten – including wheat (such as spelt and Khorasan), rye, barley and oats’
  • Crustaceans such as prawns, crab and lobsters
  • Eggs’ etc etc down to Sulphites

But…. gluten is not, technically, an allergen.

Gluten is a protein, made up of, in the case of wheat, barley and rye, the elements gliadin and glutenin; in the case oats of it is made up of avenins. An allergen is a type of antigen or structural molecule.
So the regulation is confusing from the start.

Of course, wheat, barley, rye and oats can also be antigens (allergens) and it is perfectly possible for someone to have a genuine allergic reaction to eating them.  But they are not included in the list in their own right as potential allergens as only relatively few people have allergic reactions to them; they are included because they contain gluten.

Contradictory though this may seem, one can see why the regulations were phrased this way. 

  • Gluten is what is relevant to coeliacs.
  • Coeliacs make up a very significant proportion of the allergic or food sensitive population that these regulations are trying to help – although of course coeliac disease is not an allergy but an autoimmune condition.
  • So it made total sense to include gluten in the list of ingredients that needed to be highlighted.
  • But once you drill down into the list for labelling purposes, because gluten and allergens are not the same thing, then whole thing becomes confusing and self contradictory.

However, what it means for the manufacturer is that, in order to abide strictly by the regulations, you need to highlight/bold ‘oats’ in your ingredients list, even when they are gluten free oats.

Unfortunately, this will probably just confuse the poor coeliac consumer who may worry that, because they have been highlighted, they are actually an allergen and therefore not safe for them……

Gluten free oats

As long as you are using gluten-free oats, then, according to the regulations, the product can be flagged as gluten free (eg under 20 parts per million of gluten) whether you specify that the oats are gluten free or not.

However, this is even more confusing for the consumer who doesn’t know about this aspect of the regulation. Therefore oat-tolerant coeliacs worry that if the oats in the ingredients do not state that they are gluten free, even if the overall declaration is gluten free, then the oats might not be.

So we would always advise any manufacturer to say ‘gluten-free oats’/’gluten-free oat flour’ etc whenever oats are mentioned in the ingredients.

In this context it is even more confusing for the consumer if an ingredients list contains both oats and oat flour and one is flagged as gluten free and other is not.  Even if all the oats in the product actually are gluten free the oat tolerant coeliac may be, understandably, confused.

Have you followed me so far? If so, congratulations. And you can see why I do not feel strong enough to embark on the subject of ‘may contain’ labelling right now….

close

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Category: Allergies, Coeliac/celiac disease, Food, Food/Health Policy, FreeFrom Awards, FreeFrom Food, Gluten-freeTag: 14 major allergens, are oats a major allergen?, Coeliac disease is not an allergy, FreeFrom Food Awards, Freefrom Food Awards shortlist, freefrom oats, regulations covering the 14 major allergens, Should oats be highlighted in an ingredients list?

Previous Post: « FreeFrom Food Awards judging in full swing
Next Post: The wonders of FreeCycle »

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Alex Gazzola

    10/02/2019 at 14:46

    Am so glad you’ve written this, Michelle. As you know, non-emphasised oats in ingredients labelling is a pet frustration of mine, and I’ve argued since 2015 that brands need to get into line about this … but many still haven’t, including Nairn’s.

    Another way to look at this is this: the barley in barley malt vinegar and the wheat in Codex wheat starch need to be emphasised because they are listed as gluten containing cereals, even though these particular ingredients are GF.

    Ditto gluten free oats …

  2. Michelle

    10/02/2019 at 17:21

    But, as I think we have ‘discussed’ on several occasions, Alex – I still believe that following the letter of the law in this one is actually creating more confusion for the consumer – exactly the opposite of what the regulations set out to do!!! Never mind – we will continue to agree to disagree….

  3. Alex Gazzola

    10/02/2019 at 19:20

    Oh I think we agree on more than you think!

    I do take the point that an emphasised ‘oats’ could concern an oat-tolerating coeliac. But the solution of declaring ‘gluten free oats’ – with the oats highlighted – is one I approve of, and resolves that problem. In fact, it’s one of the ways which the FSAI in Ireland recommend gluten free oats are labelled. (The other is by using an asterisk and explanatory note. See https://www.fsai.ie/legislation/food_legislation/food_information_fic/allergens.html)

    With regard to the (rare) oat allergy, a highlighted oat (whether or not preceded with gluten free) is sufficient.

    The bit I perhaps disagree with you on is this: “… oat-sensitive coeliacs worry that if the oats in the ingredients do not state that they are gluten free, even if the overall declaration is gluten free, then the oats might not be.”

    …… Oat-sensitive coeliacs don’t care whether the oats are GF or not – they avoid both!

    So I think so long as GF oats are described as GF oats, there should be no confusion for anybody even with emphasis on the ‘oats’ … It’s a shame the regulations have not specified this requirement, in fact. I may propose it to the FSA …

  4. Michelle

    10/02/2019 at 22:31

    You are right in your last para, Alex – my mis-phrasing…. thank you and will go and correct!!

  5. Stella

    11/02/2019 at 18:04

    I think there is a lot of confusion about the definition of allergy.

    There are some Coeliacs who cannot have codex wheat. I know a lady who reacts to many things that are labelled gluten free under the regulations on 20ppm. This means that she has to avoid a lot of products that have been produced specially for the Coeliac customer.

  6. Michelle

    11/02/2019 at 18:06

    There certainly is, Stella – and certainly in this connection.

  7. Benjamin Richardson

    12/02/2019 at 14:02

    Very welcome article Michelle, thank you! I am *potentially* one of those oat sensitive coeliacs and indeed, I do not care whether the oats are GF or not, I avoid them all. That is tricky too, oats are in so many places! Luckily they are fairly slow moving.

    Potentially because . . . . I am one those special silent coeliacs who has auto-immune reaction to gluten but no externally visible symptoms. Blessing and curse!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • FSA – on the allergy case
  • Homeopathy – a second string to our vaccination bow?
  • Sad, sad news
  • Are COVID vaccines safe for those with allergies?
  • Disastrous Brexit fallout for medical cannabis users

Search this blog

ARCHIVES

Blogroll

  • Allergy Insight
  • Better brains, naturally
  • For Ever FreeFrom
  • Free From (gluten)
  • Freefrom Food Awards
  • Gluten-free Mrs D
  • Natural Health Worldwide
  • Pure Health Clinic
  • Skins Matter
  • The Helminthic Therapy Wiki
  • Truly Gluten Free
  • What Allergy?

TOPICS

Disastrous Brexit fallout for medical cannabis users

Thanks to the tireless campaigning of a group of  ‘epilepsy mothers’, lead by Hannah Deacon, the mother of Alfie Dingley, and her consultant, neurologist Professor Mike Barnes, a change in the law in 2018 allowed the prescription of medical cannabis for children with certain rare types of epilepsy, those in chronic pain and for those …

The trouble about gluten-free oats

Oats are delicious – oats are nutritious – they contain high levels of vitamins, minerals and antioxidants and are an excellent source of fibre – they do not contain the protein gliadin, the gluten fraction that coeliacs need to avoid – they add texture to gluten free baking and are easy to cook with. Few …

Happy, if distanced, Christmas!

After this very strange and, for many people, horribly difficult year I wanted to wish you all a very peaceful, safe, healthy and hopefully happy Christmas. And offer you a little allergic chortle. Those of you who used to receive the FoodsMatter magazine will remember all of Christopher’s wonderful allergy related cartoons – the caption …

Good news for those with peanut allergy

The news may be grim on the virus front but there have been two bits of good news this month for those with peanut allergy. Earlier in the month The Journal of Allergy and Immunology: In Practice reported on on a trial which demonstrated that peanut oral immunotherapy is still effective after one year of …

Is it time to subject Vitamin C to serious scientific scrutiny?

Ever since 1970 when the Nobel Laureate Linus Pauling claimed that gram dose vitamin C supplementation could prevent and alleviate the common cold, the argument has rumbled on – how effective can vitamin C supplementation be for respiratory infections both mild (such as the common cold) or more acute (pneumonia and, maybe, COVID19). The evidence …

Share a meal

Yes, indeed – what a lovely thing to be able to do – and one that we have been deprived of for all too long. But, we don’t have to be. Over lockdown my good friend Sarah Stacey, who lives in a tiny village in Dorset, started cooking meals for a poorly neighbour. Talking to …

Copyright © 2021 · Michelle's Blog · Michelle Berridale Johnson · Site design by DigitalJen·